Tally’s Folly was
a great show. I haven’t been as entertained while watching a live performance
as I was during Tally’s Folly in a
long time. For a independent theatre, I think Independent Actors Theatre hit
this show out of the park. With a strong cast, strong direction and strong set,
Tally’s Folly is an enjoyable 96
minutes that are not to be missed.
One
of the things that really impressed me with the show was the acting. With a
strong performance by Matt Fotis, who coincidentally played the character Matt
Friedman, as well as a amazing job by the other lead actress Ashton Botts, who
played Sally Talley, there was never a dull moment in the play. What impressed
me most about the acting was the ability of the two actors to really assume and
deeply engage in their roles. For example, both actors dawned an accent that
seemed nothing less than legitimate; Fotis with his Eastern European accent,
and Botts with her charming country twang. There was not a moment where I felt that these accents were faked
or forced at all. What sealed the deal for me on the acting, however, was
Fotis’ ability to do near-perfect impersonations. For example, during one scene
Fotis’ character starts to make fun of Sally’s family by impersonating her
brother and then her high school sweetheart. Fotis’ adaption of a country
accent was not only hilarious, but left me in stitches because I was laughing
so hard. What really made the impression hilarious was his use of hand gestures
and facial expressions to convey an image that I can only describe as
“bubba.”
Another
aspect of the show that impressed me was the direction of the play. Director
Emily A. Rollie, a doctoral student at the University Of Missouri, really
showed her excellent ability to direct with this show. What I mean by this is
that her use of blocking and directing where the characters are to be during
each scene was near perfect. Even though the set was rather small (something
I’ll discuss in the next paragraph) Rollie did a great job making sure the
actors were in near perfect positions for each scene. For example, when Sally
gets increasingly mad at Matt and theatrens to leave, she moves towards the
edge of the stage and opens the door to the deck (the venue was a small
photography studio and the door lead directly to the outside) and speaks a
couple lines while halfway out the door. This really impressed me because It
gave a great impression of what was going on in Sally’s mind, as well as how
distraught she was with Matt. It also took the scene to the next level and I
applaud Rollie for that.
Finally,
I was extremely impressed with how the set was created and how IAT really
managed to make great use of the venue which they were in. The play, which took
place in a small photography studio, really was a perfect setting for the show.
While the stage was relatively small, it seemed fitting for an independent
theatre and a show with only two actors in it. The set was lightly garnished
with a couple oars and a few wooden boxes to accent the idea that the show
takes place in an old Victorian boathouse, and while it wasn’t the most
intricate set I have seen, really left a lot to the imagination, and felt just
right for a production that IAT would put on. What impressed me most about the
set was the ability for the actors to really conform to the space, Rollie
really used the space to the best of her ability, having the actors interact
with the doors, windows and objects that were already in place at the studio.
This use of setting and space was one that took the production from just
happening to be staged in a photography studio, to really being “perfect” for
the show.
No comments:
Post a Comment